NSG 3036 Week 5 Critique of a Nursing Research Article New

NSG 3036 Week 5 Critique of a Nursing Research Article New

NSG 3036 Week 5 Critique of a Nursing Research Article New

Identifies the research problem.

Identifies the research purpose.

Summarizes the review of literature.

Identifies the nursing framework.

Identifies the research questions and hypotheses.

Identifies the variables.

Identifies and discusses the appropriateness of the design.

Discusses the validity of the research.

Discusses the efficacy of the study and addresses if study question is resolved.

Discusses the legal and ethical issues of the study. Includes the use of human subjects and their protection.

Describes any cultural aspects of the study. NSG 3036 Week 5 Critique of a Nursing Research Article New

Describes the sample.

Describes the procedures.

Summarizes the results.

Describes how the results of the research may impact future nursing practice.

Applies the research to student’s nursing practice.

Review the PICO(T) resources listed in the topic readings.

Formulate a PICOT statement using the PICOT format used in the assigned readings. The PICOT statement will provide a framework for your Capstone Project.

In a paper of 500-750 words, clearly identify the clinical problem (from your Topic 1 approved Change Proposal) and how it can result in a positive patient outcome. NSG 3036 Week 5 Critique of a Nursing Research Article New

Make sure to address the following on the PICOT statement:

Evidence-Based Solution

Nursing Intervention

Patient Care

Health Care Agency

Nursing Practice

Recall that a PICOT starts with a designated patient population in a particular clinical area and identifies clinical problems or issues that arise from clinical care. The intervention should be an independent, specified nursing change intervention. The intervention cannot require a provider prescription or equipment change. Include a comparison to a patient population not currently receiving the intervention, and specify the timeframe needed to implement the change process. NSG 3036 Week 5 Critique of a Nursing Research Article New

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Portfolio Practice Hours

Students will track their practice hours throughout the course via the Practice Hours Completion Statement provided in this assignment.

Complete the following statement in a Word document and submit it to the instructor via the individual forum in LoudCloud. NSG 3036 Week 5 Critique of a Nursing Research Article New

Practice Hours Completion Statement NRS-490

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) practice hours in association with the goals and objectives for this course. I also verify that all required course approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

Description

This is a lot of work, please do not commit if you’re not going to complete ALL PARTS. Everything listed has to be completed.

Part 1

Identify the company that you want to research for the three written assignments in the course.

Describe the organizational issue in your chosen company.

Explain why the issue hinders organizational efficiency. NSG 3036 Week 5 Critique of a Nursing Research Article New

Part 2

SEE ATTACHMENT FOR ASSIGNMENT 2

Part 3

SEE ATTACHMENT FOR ASSIGNMENT 3

Part 4

We have all worked in a group or team at some point in our careers. A team is brought together to achieve a common goal. The team needs to have members who have complementary skills and who are committed to a common purpose to achieve performance goals. However, teams don’t move immediately toward performing, but instead evolve over time. There are five stages of group and team development. NSG 3036 Week 5 Critique of a Nursing Research Article New

Forming – Getting oriented and getting acquainted. High degree of uncertainty as members as they try to figure out who is in charge.

Storming – Personalities start to emerge, along with roles and conflicts within the group.

Norming – In the third stage conflicts are resolved, relationships developed, harmony and unity surfaces.

Performing – The members concentrate on solving problems and completing the assigned task.

Adjourning – Members prepare to disband. Some members may be reassigned, terminated from the group or the group is resolved.

Think about a time when you joined a new group . . . it could be at work, in a family setting or with a social group.

Which of the five stages was the most challenging for the group to work through, and why?

How might you have helped the group work through that stage differently based upon what you know now about the five stages of group and team development? NSG 3036 Week 5 Critique of a Nursing Research Article New

Part 5

Decision making is the process of identifying and choosing alternative courses of action. While we want to make rational decisions, sometimes we don’t . . . sometimes we make non-rational decisions.

There are four steps in rational decision-making:

Recognize and define the problem or opportunity-In business the problem can come in the form of customer complaints, supplier breakdowns, staff turnover, sales decline, etc. Organizations proactively seek opportunities to exceed goals, surpass the industry expectations and to expand and grow the business.

Identify and analyze alternative courses of action-Leaders should seek input from multiple sources to interpret and analyze the problem/opportunity to come up with as many options as possible to solve the issue.

Choose a preferred course of action-The group want to answer the following: (1) Is the action ethical?; (2) Is it feasible? (costs, technology availability; (3) Is it effective? If your answer to this question is the resolution is “good enough” you want to rethink this solution it will cause more harm than good.

Implement the preferred course of action-You need to the participation from all teams to successfully implement the action.

On the other hand, non-rational decisions are generally the result of either Satisficing (going with the first available option without much research) or Intuition (using your “gut” or just your own feelings to make decisions).

For this week’s discussion, think about a time when you made a non-rational decision on the job or in your personal life.

Was it the result of satisficing or intuition?

How would your decision have been different using the four steps for rational decision-making?

How would the steps have helped you to make a better, or more sound, decision?

Part 5 JAV

Define business operations.

List the three primary functions of a business’s operations.

List the six key functions that all businesses need to address just as part of doing business.

Define managing versus leading.

Describe one of the major differences between leaders and managers

What are the four key factors that a newly promoted leader needs to focus on?

Identify the 4 main functions of management.

Define the role of Human Resource Management or HRM as it’s often referred to.

Explain how HRM professionals are now viewed and what their main goal is.

What is the marketing mix?