Walden Values/Culture and Group Processes and their impact

Walden Values/Culture and Group Processes and their impact

Walden Values/Culture and Group Processes and their impact

Question Description

  • Select two dimensions or values described in the Resources that I uploaded
  • Then, select two cultures other than your own found in the resources I uploaded below
  • Post and briefly define the two dimensions or values you selected. Next, describe and discuss examples of how these two dimensions or values are expressed in the two cultures you selected. In your explanation, make sure to explain how socialization, social roles, social cognition, and social behavior are influenced by culture.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

 

Note: Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources and identify current relevant literature to support your work.

  • Consider the following topics and select one topic for this Discussion:
    • Romantic love/interpersonal attraction
    • Obedience and conformity
    • In group vs. out group
  • Based on the topic you selected, search for an article related to your topic as well as related to culture, group processes, and behavior/cognition.

Based on the topic you selected, post and discuss the findings from your article and indicate how culture may affect individual behavior. Make sure to include group processes and behavior/cognition in your post.

Note: Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources and identify current relevant literature to support your work.

Required Readings

Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin119, 111–137.

Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Schönherr, J. (2017). What’s so special about interaction in social cognition? Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 8(2), 181–198. doi:10.1007/s13164-016-0299-y

Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014

Credit Line: International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, & Hofstede, G. (2011). The Hofstede model in context. Retrieved from ​dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014​. Used with permission of International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology.

Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116

Credit Line: Schwartz, S. H., & International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology. (2012). An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Retrieved from ​dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116​. Used with permission of International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology.   

 

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science5, 420–430.

Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Karandashev, V. (2015). A cultural perspective on romantic love. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 5(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1135

Credit Line: Karandashev, V., & International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology. (2015). A Cultural Perspective on Romantic Love. Retrieved from ​dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1135​. Used with permission of International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology.