Walden NRNP 6645 Week 7 Humanistic–Existential Therapy
Walden NRNP 6645 Week 7 Humanistic–Existential Therapy
It is the client who knows what hurts, what directions to go, what problems are crucial, what experiences have been deeply buried.
—Carl Rogers, from On Becoming a Person
ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
This client-centered perspective is the cornerstone of humanistic-existential therapy, which requires therapists to “attempt to receive clients with curiosity and openness, endeavor to grasp their subjective world, and believe that clients are the experts on their own experience” (Wheeler, 2014, p. 373). As the psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner, it is important to understand that the effectiveness of this approach is dependent on your relationship with clients, as well as your beliefs on holism and human nature. Walden NRNP 6645 Week 7 Humanistic–Existential Therapy
This week, you compare humanistic-existential therapy with other approaches and justify its use with individual patients.
Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2014). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based practice (2nd ed.). Springer Publishing.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Distinguish between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and other types of psychotherapy
- Justify the use of humanistic-existential psychotherapy approaches with individual patients
Walden NRNP 6645 Week 7 Humanistic–Existential Therapy Learning Resources
Assignment: Comparing Humanistic-Existential Psychotherapy with Other Approaches
Photo Credit: motortion / Adobe Stock
Understanding the strengths of each type of therapy and which type of therapy is most appropriate for each patient is an essential skill of the psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner. In this Assignment, you will compare humanistic-existential therapy to another psychotherapeutic approach. You will identify the strengths and challenges of each approach and describe expected potential outcomes.
To prepare:
- Review the humanistic-existential psychotherapy videos in this week’s Learning Resources.
- Reflect on humanistic-existential psychotherapeutic approaches.
- Then, select another psychotherapeutic approach to compare with humanistic-existential psychotherapy. The approach you choose may be one you previously explored in the course or one you are familiar with and especially interested in.
The Assignment
In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:
- Briefly describe humanistic-existential psychotherapy and the second approach you selected.
- Explain at least three differences between these therapies. Include how these differences might impact your practice as a PMHNP.
- Focusing on one video you viewed, explain why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the patient in the video and why it was the treatment of choice. Describe the expected potential outcome if the second approach had been used with the patient.
- Support your response with specific examples from this week’s media and at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.
Note: The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates ). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK7Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 7 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 7 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK7Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 7 Assignment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 7 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7
To participate in this Assignment:
Week 7 Assignment
Comparing Humanistic-Existential Psychotherapy with Other Approaches Sample Paper
Psychologists have developed various theories on human psychology. The Humanist, existential, and humanist existential models explain the personality changes. The models are central in therapies as they define how people perceive and accept life challenges. The humanist model emphasizes the innate goodness in people, while the humanist-existential psychotherapy model argues that personalities change, and people can develop new attributes based on circumstances.
Two models: Humanistic-existential psychotherapy and Humanist psychotherapy Humanistic-existential Psychotherapy
According to the premise of humanistic existential psychotherapy (HE), human personality is dynamic and undergoes changes throughout life, defining personality at each stage (Hounkpatin et al., 2015 Walden NRNP 6645 Week 7 Humanistic–Existential Therapy). The model combines existentialist and humanistic perspectives. Humans are good, according to the humanist viewpoint, but the existentialist contends that people are neither good nor bad (Daei Jafari et al., 2020). Integration of the two models creates a dynamic person capable of actualizing based on situations and strengths. The model is adopted as a transition from the traditional conception of personality as a stable element that remains consistent throughout life. The HE models framework asserts that individuals confront and challenge a meaningless life as they transform their lives into a personality they desire. The person pursues self-rated health, self-efficacy, psychological turning point, and life satisfaction that involves a subjective evaluation of an individual’s wellbeing (Hounkpatin et al., 2015).
These components keep an individual driven to improve their lives. Notably, societal norms and the pursuit of authentic individual-based life goals contribute to an individual’s personality changes.
There is a constant drive to meet an expectation, which is addressed in the social investment theory- an investment in institutions such as work, and marriage motivates personality changes. Notably, the dynamic nature of life situations indicates that circumstances present new challenges requiring new solutions of different perspectives. A person discovers their needs, thereby creating a change in their personality.
The fundamental basis of the HE model is an individual’s ability to respond to external changes in adaptive personality changes. Robbins (2021) found that participants faced with the COVID19 pandemic challenge accepted their situation and developed adaptive measures propelling them into a joyful life. There is a transition from one category of personality to another.
Humanistic
The humanistic model provides a unique perspective of personality. The model postulates that people are inherently good, and that each person has a subjective identity characterized by a free will to make choices and exercise self-awareness (Locher et al., 2019). The model implies that human beings can make the right choices to maximize their wellness and neighbors.
Therefore, they can form a meaningful relationship with others and make healthy choices. Moreover, the therapist works with the patient to understand their inherent good and overcome limiting perceptions. Notably, the therapist emphasizes self-actualization and growth, contrary to emphasizing symptoms alleviation and disease treatment (Locher et al., 2019). Importantly, the model emphasizes moving onwards rather than focusing on past experiences, thereby challenging the client to positively perceive their lives. The therapist works through a relationship that encourages being one’s true self.
Differences between the two models
The fundamental difference between the two models is their position on the nature and consistency of the human personality. The humanist perspective postulates that human beings are good, while the humanistic-existential model posits that people’s personalities fluctuate.
Understanding the differences is critical in application to therapy. I would like my client to understand themselves as dynamic and capable of manifesting positive and negative personalities.
The humanist model prevents individuals from recognizing and accepting their weaknesses or bad qualities inherent in the humanist-existential perspective (Wolfe, 2016). Therefore, the client is led towards denial of events, behaviors, and personality traits defining their lives. The humanist-existential model promotes mindfulness, a critical practice that constantly evaluates their attributes to achieve personal growth and development (Daei et al., 2020). The client exists in an interconnected world and is impacted by external factors in the social, economic, and political domains. The client exists in a dynamic world and is faced with diverse challenges through interaction with other humans and objects. Therefore, their personality can shift based on the challenges in their environment. My client should accept the reality of their society and accept the need to adjust to meet the contextual needs.
Finally, while the humanist model is rigid, the humanist-existential model asserts that people are diverse, unique, integrated into reality through personalized experience, and have free will. The transformative nature of the humanist-existential model is fundamental to growth and development. Notably, I expect my client to behave differently as a child, youth, adult, an elderly person due to the uniqueness of experience in these dispensations.
Case Approach
James Bugantil highlights a humanist-existentialist perspective of psychotherapy. He has adopted the model due to his appreciation of the complex nature and different life perspectives. The clients have been driven to appreciate their limitations and guided towards harnessing strength and opportunity. I would adopt the same model due to its appreciation of the multiple dimensions of life and how this affects individuals. A humanist method would be superficial, while an existentialist method would overlook the need for a consistent personality trait.
Walden NRNP 6645 Week 7 Humanistic–Existential Therapy Paper References
Daei Jafari, M. R., Aghaei, A., & Rashidi Rad, M. (2020). Existential Humanistic Therapy with Couples and its Effect on Meaning of Life and Love Attitudes. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 48(5), 530-545. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2020.1770142
Hounkpatin, H. O., Wood, A. M., Boyce, C. J., & Dunn, G. (2015). An existential-humanistic view of personality change: Co-occurring changes with psychological well-being in a 10- year cohort study. Social Indicators Research, 121(2), 455-470. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11205-014-0648-0
Locher, C., Meier, S., & Gaab, J. (2019). Psychotherapy: A world of meanings. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 460. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2019.00460
Robbins, B. D. (2021). The joyful life: An existential-humanistic approach to positive psychology in the time of a pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 2878. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648600
Thinking Allowed TV. (2010). James Bugental: Humanistic Psychotherapy (excerpt) — A Thinking Allowed DVD w/ Jeffrey Mishlove. www.youtube.com/watch? v=mjDNKGIvWPQ
Wolfe, B. E. (2016). Existential-humanistic therapy and psychotherapy integration: A commentary. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 26(1), 56–https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000023
Walden NRNP 6645 Week 7 Humanistic–Existential Therapy Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout
| Excellent
90%–100% |
Good
80%–89% |
Fair
70%–79% |
Poor
0%–69% |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Develop a 2- to 3-page paper comparing humanistic-existential therapy to another psychotherapeutic approach of your choice. Be sure to address the following: · Briefly describe humanistic-existential psychotherapy and the second approach you selected. |
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response includes an accurate and concise description of humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach. Walden NRNP 6645 Week 7 Humanistic–Existential Therapy
|
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response includes a description of humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach.
|
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate description of humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach.
|
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response includes a vague and inaccurate description of humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach, or is missing.
|
| · Explain at least three differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and the approach you selected. · Include how these differences might impact your practice as a PMHNP. |
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response includes an accurate and clear explanation of three differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach. The response includes a thoughtful and throrough explanation of how the differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach might impact your practice as a PMHNP.
|
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of three differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach. The response includes an explanation of how the differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach might impact your practice as a PMHNP. |
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response includes a somehwat vague or inaccurate explanation of three differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach. The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of how the differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach might impact your practice as a PMHNP. |
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of three differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach, or is missing. The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of how the differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected approach might impact your practice as a PMHNP, or is missing. |
| · Explain why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the client in the video and why it was the treatment of choice. · Describe the expected potential outcome if the second approach had been used with the client. · Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature. PDFs are attached. |
32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the client and why it was the treatment of choice. The response includes a thorough and accurate description of the expected potential outcome had the second approach been used with the client. The response is supported by at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature that provide strong support for the rationale provided. PDFs are attached.
|
28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the client and why it was the treatment of choice. The response includes a description of the expected potential outcome had the second approach been used with the client. The response is supported by three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature that provide appropriate support for the rationale provided. PDFs are attached. |
24 (24%) – 27 (27%)
The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the client and why it was the treatment of choice. The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete description of the expected potential outcome had the second approach been used with the client. The response is supported by two or three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources from the literature. Resources selected may provide only weak support for the rationale provided. PDFs may not be attached. |
0 (0%) – 23 (23%)
The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the client and why it was the treatment of choice, or is missing. The response includes a vauge and incomplete description of the expected potential outcome had the second approach been used with the client, or is missing. The response is supported by vague or inaccurate evidence from the literature, or is missing. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineates all required criteria.
|
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive. |
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive. |
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Walden NRNP 6645 Week 7 Humanistic–Existential Therapy
|
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
|
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains 1 or 2 APA format errors.
|
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains 3 or 4 APA format errors.
|
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
|
| Total Points: 100 |
|---|