Order Now

Unit 4 Most Influential Books Assessment Report

Unit 4 Most Influential Books Assessment Report

Unit 4 Most Influential Books Assessment Report

Unit 4 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Books

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 10:59pm
  • Points 85
  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Instructions

Contrast: Books

EVALUATION TITLE: COMPARE AND CONTRAST BOOKS

Look up all of the books from the list below and write a 2 sentence description about each one.

Why do you think each book has been important throughout history?

  • The Meaning of Relativity by by Albert Einstein
  • On the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin
  • Geographia by Ptolemy
  • Silent Spring by Rachel Carson
  • The Complete Works of William Shakespeare By William Shakespeare
  • The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer
  • Uncle Tom’s Cabin by Harriett Beecher Stowe
  • 1984 by George Orwell
  • The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank
  • Critique of Pure Reason by Immanuel Kant
  • Native Son by Richard Wright
  • The Jungle by Upton Sinclair
  • Tibetan Book of the Dead
  • The Bible
  • The Qur’an
  • The Torah

Remember to add your Reference in APA format.

Estimated time to complete: 3 hours

Rubric

HU240 Unit 4 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Books

HU240 Unit 4 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Books
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
27.0 ptsLevel 5

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.

 24.0 ptsLevel 4

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.

 22.0 ptsLevel 3

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.

 19.0 ptsLevel 2

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.

 16.0 ptsLevel 1

Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.

 0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions
27.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
27.0 ptsLevel 5

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 24.0 ptsLevel 4

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 22.0 ptsLevel 3

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 19.0 ptsLevel 2

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 16.0 ptsLevel 1

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
27.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology
15.0 ptsLevel 5

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.

 14.0 ptsLevel 4

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.

 12.0 ptsLevel 3

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.

 11.0 ptsLevel 2

Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.

 9.0 ptsLevel 1

Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.

 0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
10.0 ptsLevel 5

The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

 6.0 ptsLevel 4

The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

 4.0 ptsLevel 3

The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication

 2.0 ptsLevel 2

The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

 1.0 ptsLevel 1

The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

 0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
6.0 ptsLevel 5

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.

 5.0 ptsLevel 4

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

 4.0 ptsLevel 3

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.

 3.0 ptsLevel 2

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.

 2.0 ptsLevel 1

The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements

 0.0 ptsLevel 0

There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.
6.0 pts
Total Points: 85.0

PreviousNext

× How can I help you?