SC 270 Herzing University Environmental Literacy Plan Paper

Unit 3 Assessment – Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase III

Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 85
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Instructions

EVALUATION TITLE: ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY PLAN – PHASE III

This week you will add to your Environmental Literacy Plan information about climate change and NIMBY in your community. You will need to explore your community and take a few pictures to include in your plan.

Discuss:

What are the main impacts of climate change?
What can the community do to slow down the effects of climate change?
Find three (3) news articles about climate change within the last two years. Summarize the articles and their impact. Cite and reference the articles in APA on the References page of the document.
Find a lake, pond, or river in your community. Take a picture of its conditions. Is there any pollution? Do you see any wildlife present? Is the water level high or low?
Explain NIMBY. What evidence of NIMBY is present in your community? Where are the water treatment plant, landfills, or power plant located?

Format this information using the template provided or create your own template. You may also modify the template layout as long as it meets all of the assignment requirements.

Validate your statements and opinions with supporting evidence (citations and references) in APA form.

Submit:

Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase III for your community (PDF or Word document)

Estimated time to complete: 5 hours

Assignment Files

Environmental Literacy Plan Template – Phase III [Word Document]

Rubric

SC270 Unit 3 Assessment – Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase III

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentSC270-CO3

25.0 ptsLevel 5

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.

23.0 ptsLevel 4

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.

21.0 ptsLevel 3

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.

19.0 ptsLevel 2

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.

16.0 ptsLevel 1

Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.

0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P

25.0 ptsLevel 5

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

23.0 ptsLevel 4

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

21.0 ptsLevel 3

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

19.0 ptsLevel 2

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

16.0 ptsLevel 1

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology

17.0 ptsLevel 5

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.

15.0 ptsLevel 4

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.

14.0 ptsLevel 3

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.

12.0 ptsLevel 2

Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.

11.0 ptsLevel 1

Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.

0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.

17.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

13.0 ptsLevel 5

The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

11.5 ptsLevel 4

The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

10.0 ptsLevel 3

The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication

9.0 ptsLevel 2

The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

7.0 ptsLevel 1

The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

13.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

5.0 ptsLevel 5

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.

4.0 ptsLevel 4

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

3.0 ptsLevel 3

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.

2.0 ptsLevel 2

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.

1.0 ptsLevel 1

The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements

0.0 ptsLevel 0

There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 85.0

PreviousNext