RES 727 Week 5 Individual Assignment Data Analysis
RES 727 Week 5 Individual Assignment Data Analysis
Write a data analysis paper of no more than 1,750 words based on your collected data set.
Identify at least two structures of meaning (transcendental) and two themes (hermeneutic), using the data set you chose. Use examples of comments to illustrate the structure or theme, and discuss how you approached data analysis in identifying each.
ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper.
Discuss how you would approach data using a coding or nodes approach to analysis, using the personal experiences you collected in Week Five (the same data set, looked at differently).
Provide examples from the data to justify your coding schema
Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper describing why and how you might employ a triangulation strategy to increase the reliability and validity of your analysis using the data set from Week Five. What additional data might you use?
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper that presents your findings and data analysis from Weeks Five through Eight using the writing techniques suggested by Van Manen in the Writing in the Dark text (OR another method for writing phenomenological findings of your choosing). Identify the technique you select, ground your analysis in the phenomenological literature, but lay it out as though this is your presentation of research findings.
Include at least two suggestions for future research.
The content is comprehensive, accurate, and/or persuasive.
The assignment:
Compares case studies with 4 other qualitative types
Answers reflect philosophical differences between types
Answers reflect practical similarities and differences
Synthesis questions shows a depth of understanding about case study methods
The paper develops a central theme or idea directed toward the appropriate audience
Major points are stated clearly, are supported by specific details, examples or analysis, and are organized logically. Major points are well researched, referenced and logical to clarify complex ideas
The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points
The conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper, and reviews major points