RES 722 Week 1 Evaluating Published Research Problems
RES 722 Week 1 Evaluating Published Research Problems
Locate two research studies in your discipline or your field of study-one study must use a qualitative method and one study must use a quantitative method.
Perform the following with each study: Identify the research problem.
Summarize the basis for the problem.
Evaluate the clarity and completeness of how the problem was described.
Explain how the problem was addressed through designing and conducting a research study.
ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
Locate three published research articles : one quantitative, one qualitative, and one mixed-method from peer-reviewed journals. These should not include the two articles from Week 1.
Write an outline or short paper in which you analyze each study based on the questions to consider within the UOP material:
Write an annotated bibliography of the three studies. Submit the outline and bibliography as one paper.
Include the research method, research design, variables, population, and geographical location. These drafts will be finalized for use in the Concept Paper Draft assignment due in Week Eight.Submit draft research questions—and hypotheses where appropriate—developed from your problem and purpose statements.
Note. The questions should be sufficiently complex and original so that the findings could contribute to the existing body of knowledge in the field.
These drafts will be finalized for use in the Concept Paper Draft assignment due in Week Eight.
Revise your purpose statements drawing on feedback from your facilitator and peers. When you post the draft research questions and hypotheses, you must also include the revised problem and purpose statements so it is possible to clearly see the connection. These research questions must be based on the problem statements and purpose statements you developed in previous weeks.
Post your research questions—and hypotheses where appropriate—to your Learning Team forum for peer feedback and suggestions for improvement.
Be sure to review your fellow peer’s statements as well and provide constructive comments.