Order Now

Nursing Practice Essay

Nursing Practice Essay

Nursing Practice Essay

Assessment Description

In collaboration with the approved course preceptor, students will identify a specific evidence-based topic “(Effectiveness of fall prevention programs in improving the patient’s safety during the healthcare process)” for the capstone project change proposal. Students should consider the clinical environment in which they are currently employed or have recently worked(Nursing Home- Senior Care Services). The capstone project topic can be a clinical practice problem, an organizational issue, a leadership or quality improvement initiative, or an unmet educational need specific to a patient population or community. The student may also choose to work with an interprofessional collaborative team.

Students should select a topic that aligns to their area of interest as well as the clinical practice setting in which practice hours are completed.

Write a 500-750 word description of your proposed capstone project topic. Include the following:

  1. The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal.
  2. The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed.
  3. A description (providing a high level of detail) regarding the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project.
  4. Effect of the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project.
  5. Significance of the topic and its implications for nursing practice.
  6. A proposed solution to the identified project topic with an explanation of how it will affect nursing practice. Nursing Practice Essay

    ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

    Rubric

    Collapse All RubricCollapse All

    collapse Project Topic for Focus of Change Proposal assessment

    Project Topic for Focus of Change Proposal

    2.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Project Topic for Focus of Change Proposal

    1. Excellent

    2.5 points

    The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.Nursing Practice Essay

    1. Good

    2.23 points

    The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

    1. Satisfactory

    1.98 points

    The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    1.88 points

    The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is presented but is largely incomplete.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is omitted.

    collapse Setting or Context Where Project Topic Is Observed assessment

    Setting or Context Where Project Topic Is Observed

    5 points

    Criteria Description

    Setting or Context Where Project Topic Is Observed

    1. Excellent

    5 points

    The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.

    1. Good

    4.45 points

    The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

    1. Satisfactory

    3.95 points

    The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.Nursing Practice Essay

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    3.75 points

    The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is presented but is largely incomplete.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is omitted.

    collapse Detailed Description of Project Topic assessment

    Detailed Description of Project Topic

    7.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Detailed Description of Project Topic

    1. Excellent

    7.5 points

    A detailed description of the project topic is clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.

    1. Good

    6.68 points

    A description of the project topic is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

    1. Satisfactory

    5.93 points

    A description of the project topic is presented. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    5.63 points

    A description of the project topic is presented but is largely incomplete.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    A description of the project topic is omitted.

    collapse Effect of Identified Problem or Issue assessment

    Effect of Identified Problem or Issue

    7.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Effect of Identified Problem or Issue

    1. Excellent

    7.5 points

    Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.

    1. Good

    6.68 points

    Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

    1. Satisfactory

    5.93 points

    Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    5.63 points

    Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is presented but is largely incomplete.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is omitted.

    collapse Topic Significance and Implications for Nursing Practice assessment

    Topic Significance and Implications for Nursing Practice

    7.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Topic Significance and Implications for Nursing Practice

    1. Excellent

    7.5 points

    Topic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.

    1. Good

    6.68 points

    Topic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

    1. Satisfactory

    5.93 points

    Topic and most criteria are presented. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    5.63 points

    Topic is presented but criteria are incomplete.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Significance of topic and its implications for nursing practice is omitted.

    collapse Proposed Solution for Identified Project Topic and Implications for Nursing Practice assessment

    Proposed Solution for Identified Project Topic and Implications for Nursing Practice

    7.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Proposed Solution for Identified Project Topic and Implications for Nursing Practice

    1. Excellent

    7.5 points

    Topic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.

    1. Good

    6.68 points

    Topic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.

    1. Satisfactory

    5.93 points

    Topic and most criteria are presented. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    5.63 points

    Topic is presented but criteria are incomplete.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    A proposed solution to the identified project topic with an explanation of how it will affect nursing practice is omitted.

    collapse Peer-Reviewed Articles assessment

    Peer-Reviewed Articles

    2.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Peer-Reviewed Articles

    1. Excellent

    2.5 points

    Eight peer-reviewed articles are presented, and each article clearly meets the assignment criteria.

    1. Good

    2.23 points

    Eight peer-reviewed articles are presented. Overall, only seven articles meet the assignment criteria.

    1. Satisfactory

    1.98 points

    Eight peer-reviewed articles are presented. Overall, only six articles meet the assignment criteria.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    1.88 points

    Fewer than seven peer-reviewed articles are presented. Overall, only five articles meet the assignment criteria.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Fewer than six peer-reviewed articles are presented.

    collapse Thesis Development and Purpose assessment

    Thesis Development and Purpose

    2.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Thesis Development and Purpose

    1. Excellent

    2.5 points

    Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

    1. Good

    2.23 points

    Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

    1. Satisfactory

    1.98 points

    Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    1.88 points

    Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

    collapse Argument Logic and Construction assessment

    Argument Logic and Construction

    2.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Argument Logic and Construction

    1. Excellent

    2.5 points

    Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

    1. Good

    2.23 points

    Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

    1. Satisfactory

    1.98 points

    Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    1.88 points

    Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

    collapse Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) assessment

    Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

    2.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

    1. Excellent

    2.5 points

    Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

    1. Good

    2.23 points

    Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

    1. Satisfactory

    1.98 points

    Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    1.88 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

    collapse Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) assessment

    Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

    1 points

    Criteria Description

    Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

    1. Excellent

    1 points

    All format elements are correct.

    1. Good

    0.89 points

    Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

    1. Satisfactory

    0.79 points

    Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    0.75 points

    Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

    collapse Documentation of Sources assessment

    Documentation of Sources

    1.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

    1. Excellent

    1.5 points

    Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    1. Good

    1.34 points

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

    1. Satisfactory

    1.19 points

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    1.13 points

    Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Sources are not documented.

    Nursing Practice Essay

× How can I help you?