Nursing Communicable Disease Essay

Nursing Communicable Disease Essay

Nursing Communicable Disease Essay

Description

 

 

Write a paper  in which you apply the concepts of epidemiology and nursing research to a communicable disease. Refer to “Communicable Disease Chain,” “Chain of Infection,” and the CDC website for assistance when completing this task.

Communicable Disease Selection

Chickenpox

Tuberculosis

Influenza

  1. Mononucleosis
  2. Hepatitis B
  3. HIV
  4. Ebola
  5. Measles
  6. Polio
  7. Influenza
  8. Epidemiology Paper Requirements
  9. Describe the chosen communicable disease, including causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment, and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Is this a reportable disease? If so, provide details about reporting time, whom to report to, etc.
  10. Describe the social determinants of health and explain how those factors contribute to the development of this disease.

Discuss the epidemiologic triangle as it relates to the communicable disease you have selected. Include the host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors. Are there any special considerations or notifications for the community, schools, or general population?

Explain the role of the community health nurse (case finding, reporting, data collection, data analysis, and follow-up) and why demographic data are necessary to the health of the community.

Identify at least one national agency or organization that addresses the communicable disease chosen and describe how the organizations contribute to resolving or reducing the impact of disease.

  1. Discuss a global implication of the disease. How is this addressed in other countries or cultures? Is this disease endemic to a particular area? Provide an example.
  2. A minimum of three peer-reviewed or professional references is required.
  3. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.Nursing Communicable Disease Essay

    ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

    Comprehensive Description of a Communicable Disease and the Demographic of Interest

    12.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Comprehensive Description of a Communicable Disease and the Demographic of Interest

    1. Excellent

    12.5 points

    Overview describing the demographic of interest and clinical description of the communicable disease is presented with a thorough, accurate, and clear overview of all of the clinical descriptors.

    1. Good

    11.5 points

    Clinical description of the communicable disease and demographic of interest is provided. Summary is brief but accurate.

    1. Satisfactory

    11 points

    Overview of the demographic of interest and clinical description of the communicable disease is presented with some inaccuracies of the clinical descriptors.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    10 points

    Limited and/or vague summary of demographic of interest and communicable disease is provided. Overview does not offer a clear representation of information necessary for epidemiological study.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Demographic of interest and clinical description are omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.

     

    collapse Determinants of Health and Explanation of How Determinants Contribute to Disease Development assessment

    Determinants of Health and Explanation of How Determinants Contribute to Disease Development

    12.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Determinants of Health and Explanation of How Determinants Contribute to Disease Development

    1. Excellent

    12.5 points

    Paper comprehensively discusses the determinants of health in relation to the communicable disease, explains their contribution to disease development, and provides evidence to support main points.

    1. Good

    11.5 points

    Paper describes each determinant of health with a comprehensive discussion of their contribution to disease development and progression.

    1. Satisfactory

    11 points

    Paper identifies the determinants of health in relation to the communicable disease selected but does not include an explanation of their role in the development of disease.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    10 points

    Paper partially describes the determinants of health in relation to disease development.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Description of the determinants of health and their role in disease development is omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.

    collapse Epidemiologic Triangle (Host Factors, Agent Factors, and Environmental Factors assessment

    Epidemiologic Triangle (Host Factors, Agent Factors, and Environmental Factors

    25 points

    Criteria Description

    Epidemiologic Triangle (Host Factors, Agent Factors, and Environmental Factors

    1. Excellent

    25 points

    The communicable disease is described thoroughly, accurately, and clearly within an epidemiological triangle. A visual description of the triangle and how the components of the model interact is included.

    1. Good

    23 points

    The communicable disease is described accurately within the context of the epidemiologic triangle. A brief description of factors and interaction is presented.

    1. Satisfactory

    22 points

    The communicable disease is described accurately and clearly within the context of the epidemiologic triangle.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    20 points

    The communicable disease is described with some inaccuracies within the epidemiologic triangle. A visual description of the factors and interaction is not present.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Description of the epidemiologic triangle is omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.

    collapse Role of the Community Health Nurse and Importance of Demographic Data assessment

    Role of the Community Health Nurse and Importance of Demographic Data

    25 points

    Criteria Description

    Role of the Community Health Nurse and Importance of Demographic Data

    1. Excellent

    25 points

    Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is clear, comprehensive, and inclusive of the community nurse’s responsibilities to primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention through tasks such as case finding, reporting, data collection and analysis, and follow-up. A clear explanation of the importance of demographic data to community health is presented.

    Nursing Communicable Disease Essay

    1. Good

    23 points

    Discussion of the role of community health nurse is clear, with a comprehensive description of skills associated with community assessment and planning. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is presented.

    1. Satisfactory

    22 points

    Discussion of the role of the community health nurses is limited, with a brief overview of skills associated with community assessment and planning. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is summarized.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    20 points

    Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is vague, with no integration of case finding, reporting, data collecting, data analysis, or follow-up skills. An incomplete explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is provided.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is omitted or unclear. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is omitted or unclear.

    collapse National Agency or Organization That Works to Addresses Communicable Disease assessment

    National Agency or Organization That Works to Addresses Communicable Disease

    12.5 points

    Criteria Description

    National Agency or Organization That Works to Addresses Communicable Disease

    1. Excellent

    12.5 points

    An agency or organization is identified. A clear and accurate description of efforts to address communicable disease is offered.

    1. Good

    11.5 points

    An agency or organization is identified, but discussion regarding efforts to address communicable disease is brief.

    1. Satisfactory

    11 points

    An agency or organization is identified, but discussion regarding efforts to address communicable disease is lacking.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    10 points

    An agency or organization is identified, but discussion is vague or inaccurate in relation to the communicable disease chosen.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Agency and description of contribution are omitted.

    collapse Global Implication assessment

    Global Implication

    12.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Global Implication

    1. Excellent

    12.5 points

    A discussion of the global implication of the disease is clear, comprehensive, and inclusive with a comprehensive description of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.

    1. Good

    11.5 points

    A discussion of the global implication of the disease is clear, with a comprehensive description of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.

    1. Satisfactory

    11 points

    A discussion of the global implication of the disease is limited, with some integration of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    10 points

    A discussion of the global implication of the disease is vague, with no integration of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is not provided.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Global implication of the disease is omitted or unclear.

    collapse Thesis, Position, or Purpose assessment

    Thesis, Position, or Purpose

    6.25 points

    Criteria Description

    Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

    1. Excellent

    6.25 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

    1. Good

    5.75 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

    Nursing Communicable Disease Essay

    1. Satisfactory

    5.5 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    5 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

    collapse Development, Structure, and Conclusion assessment

    Development, Structure, and Conclusion

    6.25 points

    Criteria Description

    Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

    1. Excellent

    6.25 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

    1. Good

    5.75 points

    The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

    1. Satisfactory

    5.5 points

    Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    5 points

    Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.

    Nursing Communicable Disease Essay

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

    collapse Evidence assessment

    Evidence

    6.25 points

    Criteria Description

    Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

    1. Excellent

    6.25 points

    Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.

    1. Good

    5.75 points

    Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

    1. Satisfactory

    5.5 points

    Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    5 points

    Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

     

    Nursing Communicable Disease Essay

    collapse Mechanics of Writing assessment

  4.  

    Mechanics of Writing

    2.5 points

    Criteria Description

    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

    1. Excellent

    2.5 points

    No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

    1. Good

    2.3 points

    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

    1. Satisfactory

    2.2 points

    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    2 points

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

    collapse Format/Documentation assessment

    Format/Documentation

    3.75 points

    Criteria Description

    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

    1. Excellent

    3.75 points

    No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

    1. Good

    3.45 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

    1. Satisfactory

    3.3 points

    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

    1. Less Than Satisfactory

    3 points

    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

    1. Unsatisfactory

    0 points

    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

    Nursing Communicable Disease Essay

× How can I help you?