NURS 590 Nursing Implementation
NURS 590 Nursing Implementation
discuss the implementation plan for your evidence-based practice project proposal. When required, create the appropriate form, table, image, or graph to fully illustrate that aspect of the intervention plan and include them in an appendix of your paper.
NURS 590 Nursing Implementation
ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Implementation Plan – Rubric
Setting and Access to Potential Subjects 8.4 points
Criteria Description
NURS 590 Nursing Implementation
Description of setting and access to potential subjects; consent or approval form is
attached in an appendix, if needed.
5. 5: Excellent 8.4 points
The setting and access to potential subjects are clearly described. A well-developed
and accurate consent or approval form is attached correctly in an appendix.
4. 4: Good 7.73 points
The setting and access to potential subjects are described. A consent or approval
form is needed and attached in an appendix. Minor revision may be needed on the
form or to correct formatting issues in the appendix. Some detail is needed for
clarity or accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory 7.39 points
The setting and access to potential subjects are generally described. Some
additional information is needed. A consent or approval form is attached but
requires some revision; the form is attached in an appendix but has formatting
errors.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 6.72 points
The setting and access to potential subjects are only partially described. A consent
or approval form is attached but contains significant errors; the form is not
attached in an appendix.
Timeline 9.6 points
Criteria Description
Description of time required; draft of timeline is attached in an appendix.
5. 5: Excellent 9.6 points
The amount of time needed to complete this project is clearly described and
general enough to be implemented at any date. A well-developed timeline is
attached correctly in an appendix.
4. 4: Good 8.83 points
Collapse All
NURS 590 Nursing Implementation
The amount of time needed to complete this project is described and general
enough to be implemented at any date. Minor revision may be needed on the
timeline, or to correct formatting issues in the Appendix. Some detail is needed for
clarity or accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory 8.45 points
The amount of time needed to complete this project is generally described. Some
additional information is needed. A timeline is attached but requires some revision;
the timeline is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 7.68 points
The amount of time needed to complete this project is only partially described. A
timeline is attached but contains significant errors; the timeline is not attached in
an appendix.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Budget and Resource List 9.6 points
Criteria Description
Description of resources or changes required; outline of cost and budget and resource
list are attached in an appendix.
5. 5: Excellent 9.6 points
A detailed description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are
clearly presented. A well-developed budget and resource list are attached correctly
in an appendix.
4. 4: Good 8.83 points
NURS 590 Nursing Implementation
Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are presented.
Minor revision maybe needed on the budget or resource list, or to correct
formatting issues in the appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory 8.45 points
Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are generally
presented. Some additional information is needed. A budget and resource list are
attached but require some revision; the list is attached in an appendix but has
formatting errors.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 7.68 points
Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are partially
presented. A budget and resource list are attached but contain significant errors;
the list is not attached in an appendix.
Research Design 8.4 points
Criteria Description
NURS 590 Nursing Implementation
Quantitative or qualitative design to collect data and evaluate effectiveness.
5. 5: Excellent 8.4 points
A research design is selected. A thorough explanation for how the design will be
used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice
project proposal is presented. Strong rationale is provided for support.
4. 4: Good 7.73 points
A research design is selected. An explanation of how the design will be used to
collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project
proposal is presented. Adequate rationale is provided for support.
3. 3: Satisfactory 7.39 points
A research design is selected. A general explanation of how the design will be used
to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project
proposal is presented. More rational is needed for support.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 6.72 points
A research design is selected. It is unclear how the design will be used to collect
data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Methods and Instruments 8.4 points
Criteria Description
Methods or instruments used for monitoring implementation.
5. 5: Excellent 8.4 points
The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the
proposed solution are thoroughly described. The methods or instruments are
accurate and correctly attached in an appendix.
4. 4: Good 7.73 points
The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the
proposed solution are described. Minor revision may be needed for the methods or
instruments, or to correct formatting issues in the appendix. Some detail is needed
for clarity or accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory 7.39 points
The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the
proposed solution are summarized, but more information is needed. The methods
or instruments are attached but require some revision; the list is attached in an
appendix but has formatting errors.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 6.72 points
The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the
proposed solution are only partially discussed. A methods or instruments are
attached but contain significant errors; the methods or instruments are not
attached in an appendix.
Process for Delivering Intervention and Needed Training 8.4 points
Criteria Description
Process for Delivering Intervention and Needed Training
5. 5: Excellent 8.4 points
The process for delivering the intervention and any needed training is thoroughly
explained. Strong rationale is provided for support.
4. 4: Good 7.73 points
The process for delivering the intervention and any needed training is explained.
Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory 7.39 points
The process for delivering the intervention and any needed training is summarized.
More information or support is needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 6.72 points
The process for delivering the intervention is only partially described.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Stakeholders for Implementation 8.4 points
Criteria Description
Stakeholders for Implementation
5. 5: Excellent 8.4 points
A thorough discussion of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is presented.
Strong rationale is provided for support.
4. 4: Good 7.73 points
An adequate discussion of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is
presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory 7.39 points
A summary of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is presented. More
information or support is needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 6.72 points
The discussion of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Barriers or Challenges to Plan and Strategies for Overcoming 8.4 points
Criteria Description
Barriers or Challenges to Plan and Strategies for Overcoming
5. 5: Excellent 8.4 points
Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are thoroughly
discussed and clear strategies for overcoming these are proposed. Strong rationale
is provided for support.
4. 4: Good 7.73 points
Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are discussed and
strategies for overcoming these are proposed. Some detail is needed for clarity or
accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory 7.39 points
Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are summarized.
General strategies for overcoming these are presented.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 6.72 points
Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are only partially
discussed.
Evidence of Feasibility 8.4 points
Criteria Description
Evidence of Feasibility
5. 5: Excellent 8.4 points
The feasibility of the implementation plan is thoroughly discussed. Strong rationale
is provided for support.
4. 4: Good 7.73 points
The feasibility of the implementation plan is discussed. Some detail is needed for
clarity or accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory 7.39 points
The feasibility of the implementation plan is outlined. More information or support
is needed to demonstrate the feasibility of the plan.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 6.72 points
The feasibility of the implementation plan is only partially discussed.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Required Sources 6 points
Criteria Description
Required Sources
5. 5: Excellent 6 points
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current and appropriate for the
assignment criteria and nursing content.
4. 4: Good 5.52 points
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are
appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
3. 3: Satisfactory 5.28 points
Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 4.8 points
Number of required sources is only partially met.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Sources are not included
Thesis Development and Purpose 8.4 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. 5: Excellent 8.4 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement
makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. 4: Good 7.73 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and
reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. 3: Satisfactory 7.39 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 6.72 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction 9.6 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. 5: Excellent 9.6 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and
compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. 4: Good 8.83 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident.
There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most
sources are authoritative.
3. 3: Satisfactory 8.45 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents
minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the
purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 7.68 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There
are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not
Mechanics of Writing 6 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.
5. 5: Excellent 6 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good 5.52 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The
writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. 3: Satisfactory 5.28 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to
the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate
language are employed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 4.8 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct
but not varied.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Paper Format 6 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.
5. 5: Excellent 6 points
All format elements are correct.
4. 4: Good 5.52 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. 3: Satisfactory 5.28 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be
present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 4.8 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with
formatting is apparent.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Documentation of Sources 6 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as
appropriate to assignment and style.
5. 5: Excellent 6 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is free of error.
4. 4: Good 5.52 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is
mostly correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory 5.28 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some
formatting errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 4.8 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to
assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Total 120 points
NURS 590 Nursing Implementation