NUR 630 Quality in Health Care Task

The purpose of this assignment is to apply the concepts you have learned in this course to a situation you have encountered. Choose one quality or patient safety concern with which you are familiar and that you have not yet discussed in this course. In an essay, reflect on what you have learned in this course by applying the concepts to the quality or patient safety concern you have selected. Include the following in your essay:

Briefly describe the issue and associated challenges.
Explain how EBP, research, and PI would be utilized to address the issue.
Explain the PI or QI process you would apply and discuss why you chose it.
Describe your data sources, including outcome and process data.
Explain how the data will be captured and disseminated.

Discuss which organizational culture considerations will be essential to the success of your work.

ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

NUR 630 Benchmark – Outcome and Process Measures

Need a 1,000-1,250 word paper, consider the outcome and process measures that can be used for CQI. Include the following in your essay:

At least two process measures that can be used for CQI.
At least one outcome measure that can be used for CQI.
A description of why each measure was chosen.
An explanation of how data would be collected for each (how each will be measured).
An explanation of how success would be determined.
One or two data-driven, cost-effective solutions to this challenge.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, apa 7^th edition, An abstract is not required. Please use at least 4 sources.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment.

This is the milestone for this assignment: 6.5 Generate data-driven, cost-effective solutions to organizational challenges.

Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
NUR-630	NUR-630-O500	Benchmark – Outcome and Process Measures	120.0

Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%)	3: Satisfactory (88.00%)	4: Good (92.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	100.0%
Process Measures	11.0%	Two process measures are not present.	Two process measures are incomplete or not applicable.	NA	NA	Two process measures are present.

Outcome Measures	11.0%	One outcome measure is not present.	One outcome measure is incomplete or not applicable.	NA	NA	One outcome measure is present.

Description of Why Each Measure Was Chosen	12.0%	A description of why each measure was chosen is not present.	A description of why each measure was chosen is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.	A description of why each measure was chosen is present.	A description of why each measure was chosen is present and detailed.	A description of why each measure was chosen is present and thorough.

Explanation of How Data Would Be Collected for Each Measure	12.0%	An explanation of how data would be collected for each measure is not present.	An explanation of how data would be collected for each measure is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.	An explanation of how data would be collected for each measure is present.	An explanation of how data would be collected for each measure is present and detailed.	An explanation of how data would be collected for each measure is present and thorough.

Explanation of How Success Would Be Determined	12.0%	An explanation of how success would be determined is not present.	An explanation of how success would be determined is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.	An explanation of how success would be determined is present.	An explanation of how success would be determined is present and detailed.	An explanation of how success would be determined is present and thorough.

Data Driven, Cost-Effective Solutions (C6.5.)	12.0%	One or two data-driven, cost-effective solutions to this challenge are not present.	One or two data-driven, cost-effective solutions to this challenge are incomplete or not applicable.	One or two data-driven, cost-effective solutions to this challenge are present.	One or two data-driven, cost-effective solutions to this challenge are detailed.	One or two data-driven, cost-effective solutions to this challenge are present and thorough. Solutions provided are appropriate for the task.

Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. NUR 630 Quality in Health Care Task	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. NUR 630 Quality in Health Care Task	All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Total Weightage	100%