Order Now

NR 439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature

NR 439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature

NR 439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature

Reading Research Literature – Week 5
Type your answers to the following questions using complete sentences and correct grammar, spelling, and syntax. Click Save as and save the file with your last name and Assignment, e.g.,NR 439 _RRL_Smith.Submit to the Week 5 RRL basket in the Dropbox by11:59 pm MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. The guidelines and grading rubric for this Assignment may be found in Doc Sharing.
Title: RRL


The following questions pertain to:
George, S., & Thomas, S. (2010). Lived experience of diabetes among older, rural people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(5), 1092-1100.
1) What is the purpose of this research?
2) What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.
3) Did the authors describe the research design of this study? If so, give a description.
4) Describe the population (sample) for this study. NR 439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature


5) Was the sample adequate for the research design that was selected?
6) Describe the data collection procedure.
7) How were the data analyzed after collection?
8) Discuss the limitations found in the study.
9) Discuss the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?
10) How does this advance knowledge in the field? The following questions pertain to: Hunt, C., Sanderson, B., Ellison, K., (2014). Support for diabetes using technology: A pilot study to improve self-management. MedSurgNursing, 23(4), 231-237. NR 439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature


11)What is the purpose of this research?
12)What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.
13) Did the authors describe the research design of this study? If so, give a description. 14)Describe the population (sample) for this study.
15) Was the sample adequate for the research design that was selected?
16) Describe the data collection procedure.
17)How were the data analyzed?
18)Discuss the limitations found in the study?
19)Discuss the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?
20)How does this advance knowledge in the field.

Description

PROPOSAL – WEEK 2 (50 POINTS)

Create a proposal of approximately 700 words that references one academic scholarly source for the research project you intend to complete. This project should engage at least one academic source, should include an introduction and thesis to the best extent that you know it at this point in time, and should locate a central controversy that requires deft and subtle handling. Be sure to adhere to APA style for in-text citation and final reference page. (No cover page is needed.) NR 439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature

Select a project from among those suggested on the Course Project page under Course Home or discuss a special topic with your professor.

Example Introduction/Thesis to a Student Paper:

It never ceases to amaze me that we pay so little attention to the greatest bulk of our intelligence—that is, the quality of thinking that helps us adapt, deal with stress, love, and live lives of fulfillment. Aristotle argued that educating the mind and not the heart is no education at all. For decades, educators have focused on cognitive skills because they are testable and, therefore, metrics can be applied to them. This kind of education, testing, and then metrically interpreting results has governed American education for decades. And the results have been losses of creativity, imagination, courtesy, civic interest, and the ability to invent businesses that serve people and advance us as a society. Although measurable skills are important, they are not exclusively important, and in fact lose value when separated from an education in the heart, the spirit, and the abstract qualities that make students fully human and excellent participants in a healthy society.

Example Publication Detail Capture:

Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63.

uggested Topics of Investigation

Here are suggested topics, which you may elect to use or not use. If you wish to work outside of these suggestions, be sure to clear your project with your professor.

  • Compare and contrast society during the early Renaissance in Europe to contemporary society
  • Compare and contrast human understanding of the nature of revenge prior to and after the creation of Hamlet
  • Analyze the themes, imagery or interpretation of The Waste Land and describe how one or more of these are found in contemporary society NR 439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature
  • Evaluate the work of Artemisia Gentileschi Renaissance Artist and interpret why she is considered an early feminist
  • Analyze views of women’s reproductive solutions in the 19th Century and interpret their historical and contemporary impact.
  • Distinguish the essential differences between the major thought of Plato and Aristotle and use the information to illustrate the impact of philosophy on contemporary views on a given them (life, freedom, power, equality, and more) NR 439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature
  • Examine views of warfare and battle throughout the ages and provide an interpretation that explains the evolution of the faceless war
  • Analyze the impact of the Industrial Age and the rise of capitalism and discuss the key features of both and their influence on contemporary society
  • Investigate the history of slavery and discuss the ways in which this history impacts contemporary society NR 439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature

  • Week 2: Course Project: Proposal

    The Course Project proposal is due.Please review the Course Project Overview in Introduction and Resources for details. NR 439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature

    Rubric

    Course Project Topic Proposal
    Course Project Topic Proposal
    Criteria Ratings Pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

    25.0 pts

    Proposal addresses all aspects of the assignment. •The thesis statement clearly defines the topic •The introduction and thesis clearly identify a central controversy •The purpose of the paper is clear.

    21.0 pts

    Proposal addresses most aspects of the assignment. •The thesis statement clearly defines the topic •The introduction and thesis clearly identify a central controversy •The purpose of the paper is clear. NR 439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature

    17.0 pts

    Proposal addresses some aspects of the assignment. •The thesis statement clearly defines the topic •The introduction and thesis clearly identify a central controversy •The purpose of the paper is clear.

    13.0 pts

    Proposal addresses few aspects of the assignment. •The thesis statement clearly defines the topic •The introduction and thesis clearly identify a central controversy •The purpose of the paper is clear. NR 439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature

    0.0 pts

    No effort
    25.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity, Organization, and Writing Quality

    10.0 pts

    Throughout the whole work, the writing •actively engages with the topic •is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation •demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety •logically organizes ideas NR 439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature

    8.5 pts

    Throughout most of the work, the writing •actively engages with the topic •is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation •demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety •logically organizes ideas

    7.0 pts

    Throughout some of the work, the writing •actively engages with the topic •is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation •demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety •logically organizes ideas

    5.5 pts

    Throughout little of the work, the writing •actively engages with the topic •is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation •demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety •logically organizes ideas NR 439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature

    0.0 pts

    No effort
    10.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences

    10.0 pts

    •At least one academic scholarly source is identified •The proposal includes an APA citation in proper format.

    6.0 pts

    •At least one academic scholarly source is identified •The reference is not properly cited. NR 439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature

    0.0 pts

    There is no academic scholarly source included.
    10.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength

    5.0 pts

    Proposal is 2 pages.

    0.0 pts

    Proposal is one page or less.
    5.0 pts
    Total Points: 50.0