Health Care and Culture Ethics Practices Discussion
Health Care and Culture Ethics Practices Discussion
The purpose of this assignment is to discuss health care culture and describe how CWV can be used to improve ethical practices. In a 1,000-1,250-word essay, discuss the important factors associated with health care culture. Include the following in your essay:
Health Care and Culture Ethics Practices Discussion
A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and safety.
Two or three examples of principles for building a culture of excellence and safety.
- An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture.
- An explanation of how Christian worldview (CWV) principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices, whether the organizations are Christian or not.
- Two or three examples of how the integration of faith learning and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture.
- This assignment requires a minimum of three peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
- Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.Health Care and Culture Ethics Practices Discussion
ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
Rubric
Collapse All RubricCollapse All
collapse Definition of Health Care Culture assessment
Health Care and Culture Ethics Practices Discussion
Definition of Health Care Culture
11 points
Criteria Description
Definition of Health Care Culture
- Target
11 points
A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of safety, is present and thorough.
- Acceptable
10.12 points
A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of safety, is present and detailed.
- Approaching
9.68 points
A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of safety, is present.
- Insufficient
8.8 points
A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of safety is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
A definition of health care culture is not present.
collapse Examples of How to Build a Culture of Excellence and Culture of Safety assessmen
Health Care and Culture Ethics Practices Discussion
Examples of How to Build a Culture of Excellence and Culture of Safety
12 points
Criteria Description
Examples of How to Build a Culture of Excellence and Culture of Safety
- Target
12 points
Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are present and thorough. All examples are appropriate.
- Acceptable
11.04 points
Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are present and detailed. Most examples are appropriate.
- Approaching
10.56 points
Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are present. Some examples are appropriate.
- Insufficient
9.6 points
Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are present, but lack details or are incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of safety are not present.
collapse Role of Various Stakeholders in Improving Health Care Culture assessment
Role of Various Stakeholders in Improving Health Care Culture
12 points
Criteria Description
Role of Various Stakeholders in Improving Health Care Culture
- Target
12 points
An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is present and thorough.
- Acceptable
11.04 points
An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is present and detailed.
- Approaching
10.56 points
An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is present.
- Insufficient
9.6 points
An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture is not present.
collapse Explanation of How CWV Principles Might Be Used assessment
Explanation of How CWV Principles Might Be Used
12 points
Criteria Description
Explanation of How CWV Principles Might Be Used by Health Care Organizations to Improve Their Ethical Practices
- Target
12 points
An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is present and thorough.
- Acceptable
11.04 points
An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is present and detailed.
- Approaching
10.56 points
An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is present.
- Insufficient
9.6 points
An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices is not present.
collapse Examples of How the Integration of Faith, Learning, and Work assessment
Examples of How the Integration of Faith, Learning, and Work
12 points
Criteria Description
Examples of How the Integration of Faith, Learning, and Work at GCU Can Be Implemented by Individuals to Improve Health Care Culture
- Target
12 points
Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present and thorough.
- Acceptable
11.04 points
Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present and detailed.
- Approaching
10.56 points
Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present.
- Insufficient
9.6 points
Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present, but lack details or are incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are not present.
collapse Scholarly Sources assessment
Scholarly Sources
11 points
Criteria Description
Scholarly Sources
- Target
11 points
A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources are distinctive and address all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
- Acceptable
10.12 points
A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources address all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
- Approaching
9.68 points
A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present.
- Insufficient
8.8 points
Two or three peer-reviewed, sources are present, but are not scholarly. Limited research is present.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are not present.
collapse Thesis, Position, or Purpose assessment
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
7 points
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
- Target
7 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.
- Acceptable
6.44 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
- Approaching
6.16 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
- Insufficient
5.6 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
collapse Development, Structure, and Conclusion assessment
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
8 points
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
- Target
8 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
- Acceptable
7.36 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
- Approaching
7.04 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
- Insufficient
6.4 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
collapse Evidence assessment
Evidence
5 points
Criteria Description
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
- Target
5 points
Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.
- Acceptable
4.6 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.
- Approaching
4.4 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
- Insufficient
4 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
collapse Mechanics of Writing assessment
Mechanics of Writing
5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
- Target
5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
- Acceptable
4.6 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
- Approaching
4.4 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
- Insufficient
4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
collapse Format/Documentation assessment
Format/Documentation
5 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
- Target
5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
- Acceptable
4.6 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
- Approaching
4.4 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
- Insufficient
4 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Health Care and Culture Ethics Practices Discussion