HC 366 Herzing University Healthcare Manager Memorandum
HC 366 Herzing University Healthcare Manager Memorandum
Unit 1 Assignment – Memo From Manager
Submit Assignment
- Due Sunday by 11:59pm
- Points 20
- Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Instructions
Estimated time to complete: 3 hours
Assume the role of the manager in a small physician’s practice. The practice includes three physicians, one nurse practitioner, three medical assistants, and a front desk individual. Due to the passage of the HITECH Act, the practice is in the process of identifying the best electronic medical record program for implementation. In order to transition to the new program, the manager needs to research, prepare for, and implement the change. Throughout this course, each unit assessment from units 1 – 6 will encompass an aspect of this change, culminating with the creation of an overall plan for the change process.
Instructions: Taking into consideration the scenario above, draft a memo to the staff regarding the new EMR implementation plan. The memo needs to be informational and needs to include the reasons for the change and a proposed plan of action.
Include the following content in the memo:
- Title of plan
- Estimated time to complete plan
- Reasoning behind the change
- Proposed plan of action and information on the change process (This should be a “big picture” summary – the plan will be developed in more depth in a later unit)
- Contact person for questions and concerns (This should be you, as the office manager in the scenario)
- List of at least 3 potential questions and answers (FAQ – Frequently Asked Questions)
- Expected start date of the plan
- The next step in the process
Rubric
Unit 1 Assignment – Memo From Manager
Unit 1 Assignment – Memo From Manager
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent |
| 10.0 ptsLevel 5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. |
9.0 ptsLevel 4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed. |
8.0 ptsLevel 3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial. |
7.0 ptsLevel 2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors. |
6.0 ptsLevel 1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement. |
0.0 ptsLevel 0
There is no evidence of a defined statement. |
|
10.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P |
| 5.0 ptsLevel 5
Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. |
4.5 ptsLevel 4
Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. |
4.0 ptsLevel 3
Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. |
3.5 ptsLevel 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities. |
3.0 ptsLevel 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. |
0.0 ptsLevel 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. |
|
5.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting |
| 5.0 ptsLevel 5
The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. |
4.5 ptsLevel 4
The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication. |
4.0 ptsLevel 3
The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication. |
3.5 ptsLevel 2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. |
3.0 ptsLevel 1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning. |
0.0 ptsLevel 0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning. |
|
5.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I |
| 0.0 ptsLevel 0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references. |
0.0 ptsLevel 1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references. |
0.0 ptsLevel 2
The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. |
0.0 ptsLevel 3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. |
0.0 ptsLevel 4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. |
0.0 ptsLevel 5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references. |
|
0.0 pts |
| Total Points: 20.0 |