HC 306 Herzing Unit 7 Assignment – Financial Growth Proposal

HC 306 Herzing Unit 7 Assignment – Financial Growth Proposal

HC 306 Herzing Unit 7 Assignment – Financial Growth Proposal

Unit 7 Assignment – Financial Growth Proposal

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 100
  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Estimated time to complete: 3 hours

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Instructions

In the field of health care, one thing is for certain: innovation will continue to grow exponentially. “..Most of the innovations that healthcare leaders say they are excited about have less to do with medical advances and more to do with improving how health care is accessed, provided, and paid for in this country” (Phillips, 2015). Understanding how to support and move forward with this growth is essential for a health care manager.

Research and prepare a proposal to address the following health care topic/issue:

  • An assisted living center wants to add a fitness studio, staffed by licensed Physical Therapists.

You will need to use a document template for this assignment. Templates may be found by searching Microsoft Word. A few examples include the “Business Plan” and “Project Scope Report” templates. You will need to edit the template headers to be applicable to this assignment, but retain the overall design elements to create a clean, professional-looking document.

Use the following outline within your template. Bolded items should be used as section headings. Additional subcategories may be included:

  • Executive Summary
    • What is being proposed?
  • Proposal Description
    • Supporting documentation: basic financials (ex: purchase price, lease or buy options, average reimbursement rates, etc.)
  • Market Assessment
    • Utilization of the product or service
  • Financial & Risk Analysis
    • Provide a clear picture of revenues, expenses, profits, etc.
    • How will the project be financed?
    • What is the expected ROI?
    • What is the financial risk? (include how risk is calculated)
  • Recommendation
    • Is this a viable option?
    • How should the entity proceed?
  • On a separate page, include a minimum of three references, in APA format.

Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.

Submit:

  • Financial Growth Proposal – Word document (.doc) or PDF

Reference: http://www.hfma.org/Leadership/E-Bulletins/2015/April/What_Will_Health_Care_Look_Like_in_5-15_Years_/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Rubric

HC306 – Unit 7 Assignment

HC306 – Unit 7 Assignment

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
35.0 pts5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

32.0 pts4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

28.0 pts3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

25.0 pts2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

21.0 pts1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0 pts0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

35.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
45.0 pts5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

41.0 pts4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

36.0 pts3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

31.0 pts2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

27.0 pts1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

45.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
10.0 pts5

The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

9.0 pts4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

8.0 pts3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

7.0 pts2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

6.0 pts1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
10.0 pts5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

9.0 pts4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

8.0 pts3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

7.0 pts2

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

6.0 pts1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

10.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0

PreviousNext

× How can I help you?