EN304 Herzing Scholarly Article Scavenger Hunt Questions

Unit 2 Assessment Scholarly Article Scavenger Hunt

Submit Assignment

Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 65
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Instructions

Examine: Scholarly Article

EVALUATION TITLE: SCHOLARLY ARTICLE SCAVENGER HUNT

Choose a scholarly journal article from the Herzing Academic Library that is of interest to you.

Remember that a scholarly journal article is

To inform and report on original research or experimentation to the rest of the scholarly world.
Includes graphs, charts and images that support the research.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Instructions:

Using the article chosen to complete the chart below.
Please compose answers in complete scholarly sentences and paragraphs.

Article reference in APA format.
Provide the link to the article.
List the contextual questions you would use to guide your reading (2-4 questions).
What is the technique that the author is using?
Is the technique effective?
Which of the note taking methods would you use when reading this article?
Explain why you would choose the identified note taking strategy.
Identify the audience for this article.
Explain the purpose of this article.
How do graphs and charts support the article?
How is the voice of authority evident in this article
Provide three discipline specific vocabulary words and definitions from the article.
How are images used to support the information provided in the article?

Validate your statements and opinions with supporting evidence (citations and references) in APA form.

Estimated time to complete: 4 hours

Rubric

Unit 2 Assessment Scholarly Article Scavenger Hunt

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentEN304-CO4; EN304-CO3

20.0 ptsLevel 5

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.

18.0 ptsLevel 4

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.

16.0 ptsLevel 3

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.

14.0 ptsLevel 2

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.

12.0 ptsLevel 1

Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.

0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P

20.0 ptsLevel 5

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

18.0 ptsLevel 4

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

16.0 ptsLevel 3

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

14.0 ptsLevel 2

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

12.0 ptsLevel 1

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology

10.0 ptsLevel 5

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.

9.0 ptsLevel 4

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.

8.0 ptsLevel 3

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.

7.0 ptsLevel 2

Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.

6.0 ptsLevel 1

Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.

0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

10.0 ptsLevel 5

The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

6.0 ptsLevel 4

The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

4.0 ptsLevel 3

The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication

2.0 ptsLevel 2

The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

1.0 ptsLevel 1

The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

5.0 ptsLevel 5

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.

4.0 ptsLevel 4

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

3.5 ptsLevel 3

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.

3.0 ptsLevel 2

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.

2.0 ptsLevel 1

The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements

0.0 ptsLevel 0

There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 65.0