Determinants of Public Health that Had a Role in Covid19 Pandemic Discussion

Determinants of Public Health that Had a Role in Covid19 Pandemic Discussion

Determinants of Public Health that Had a Role in Covid19 Pandemic Discussion

​I want full marks please

All instructions on the assignment must be adhered to
Solve all questions
response should be a minimum of 5 sentences but should not exceed 250 words. Appropriately cite any of the references that you use to fully answer the questions.

ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

 

1

“High blood pressure, high cholesterol, smoking, obesity, and diabetes are leading causes of stroke. Now there is growing evidence that COVID-19 infection may also increase the risk of stroke”.In this  scenario, suppose  you are a researcher  and planning to conduct a study, find the evidence in the link between COVID – 19 infection and stroke. Discuss the possible  research question, research hypothesis, and research design for your study? 

Instructions for Completing the Discussion Questions:

  • Please post your original response by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. Your response should be a minimum of 5 sentences but should not exceed 250 words. Appropriately cite any of the references that you use to fully answer the questions.

 

2

  • Discuss 4 determinants of public health that had a role in COVID 19 pandemic? In your opinion, order them in priority?

 

3-

COVID 19 (Coronavirus) has made life very stressful and there is high reliance on leaders and managers to work and achieve organizational goals. Please read the articles below and discuss about the most important roles of leaders and managers in organizations that should be considered in these circumstances.

Links to articles:

https://www.safetyandhealthmagazine.com/articles/19705-safety-leadership-how-leaders-can-rethink-their-role-amid-the-covid-19-pandemic

 

https://www.fastcompany.com/90494094/this-is-the-most-essential-skill-leaders-need-to-work-through-the-covid-19-crisis

 

Submission Instructions

Instructions for Completing the Discussion Questions:

  • Please post your original response by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. Your response should be a minimum of 5sentences but should not exceed 250 words. Appropriately cite any of the references that you use to fully answer the questions.

 

4

 

Purpose

 

The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate your understanding of the concepts learned in this week’s lessons by responding to discussion questions.

 

discussion prompt:

1-The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), published by the American Psychiatric Association, provides the foundation for the population measurement of mental disorders. What do you think are the most significant benefits of the DSM for public mental health workers? For researchers in public mental health? Why?

 

2-

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to help you learn more about the members of your learning organizational behaviour.

 

Action- Q  Explain why learning of organizational behavior is important for public health students?

Grading Criteria

 

Refer to the Discussion Grading Rubric below for specific criteria: 0–5 points

 

The following rubric will be used to assess this discussion assignment. Please familiarize yourself with it and do not hesitate to refer back to it before, during, and after composing your discussion responses.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Criteria Level 2 Level 1
Netiquette Responses conform to the criteria in the Discussion Guidelines object.
.5 point
Responses do not conform to the criteria in the Discussion Guidelines object.
0 points
Critical Thinking & Support Level 3 Level 2 Level 1
Clearly and accurately connects the topic to the reading, research, and own experiences. Opinions are supported with logical reasoning and well-chosen evidence, cited when appropriate.
1 point
Connects the topic to the reading and to own experiences. Supports opinions with adequate reasoning and evidence, cited when appropriate.
.5 point
Does not attempt to connect the topic to the reading or own experiences or attempts to connect are vague, incorrect. Opinions not supported by reasoning or evidence. Support that should be cited is not.
0 points
Initial Response Response critically examines the issues related to the statement or question posed in the discussion prompt.
2 points
Response superficially examines the issues related to the statement or question posed in the discussion prompt.
1.5 points
Response does not examine the issues related to the statement or question posed in the discussion prompt.
0 points
Replies to Classmates Furthers the discussion with a related comment, insight or question. Goes beyond agreement and does not merely address the same issues as the previous post, but rather uses those as a jumping off point to bring in other issues or provides a dissenting opinion and the reasoning behind it.
1.5 points
Furthers the discussion with a related comment, insight or question. Addresses only those issues in the previous post, but from another point of view.
1 point
Post does not further the discussion with either a related comment, insight or question, does not address the issues at all, or simply states agreement with a previous post.
0 points