Nursing Information paper on Self Inventory of Information Literacy
Nursing Information paper on Self Inventory of Information Literacy
This is a clarification on the self inventory assignment
1. You are expected to review the Nursing Competencies related to Information and Computer Literacy.
2. Then, assess your information and computer literacy skills and identify areas for learning.
3. You are to write a 1-2 page reflection of your own assessment of your literacy skills and areas for learning.
4. Also you are required to, select three areas for skills improvement and create a learning plan for how you can obtain the knowledge and skills to advance your competencies.
NB. [A learning plan template is on canvas for your part 2 of the assignment. This is how you wish to improve your computer literacy based on your assessment of your weaknesses.]
Instructions
- Review the Nursing Competencies related to Information and Computer Literacy.
- Assess your information and computer literacy skills and identify areas for learning and write a 1-2 page reflection of your own assessment of your literacy skills and areas for learning.
- Select three areas for skills improvement and create a learning plan for how you can obtain the knowledge and skills to advance your competencies.
Computer Literacy Example: If you do not know how to create a spreadsheet, what resources could help you learn this skill? What is your target for accomplishing this goal?
Information Literacy Example: If you struggle with developing a searchable question or statement, then planning and implementing the search, what resources could help you learn this skill?
LEARNING PLAN
| Learner Objectives
(SMART Goal) |
Resources to accomplish the goal
(with citation) |
Time Frame
(target for accomplishing this goal) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rubric
NU225 Unit 2 Assignment – Self Inventory of Information Literacy
NU225 Unit 2 Assignment – Self Inventory of Information Literacy
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentNU225-CO1; NU225-CO2; NU225-CO4; NU225-CO5 |
| 50.0 ptsLevel 5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. |
45.0 ptsLevel 4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed. |
40.0 ptsLevel 3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial. |
35.0 ptsLevel 2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors. |
30.0 ptsLevel 1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement. |
0.0 ptsLevel 0
There is no evidence of a defined statement. |
|
50.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisNU225-CO1; NU225-CO2; NU225-CO4; NU225-CO5 |
| 50.0 ptsLevel 5
Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. |
45.0 ptsLevel 4
Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. |
40.0 ptsLevel 3
Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. |
35.0 ptsLevel 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities. |
30.0 ptsLevel 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. |
0.0 ptsLevel 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. |
|
50.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting |
| 40.0 ptsLevel 5
The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. |
34.67 ptsLevel 4
The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication. |
29.33 ptsLevel 3
The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication. |
24.0 ptsLevel 2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. |
18.67 ptsLevel 1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning. |
0.0 ptsLevel 0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning. |
|
40.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I |
| 10.0 ptsLevel 5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references. |
9.0 ptsLevel 4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. |
8.0 ptsLevel 3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. |
7.0 ptsLevel 2
The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. |
6.0 ptsLevel 1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references. |
0.0 ptsLevel 0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references. |
|
10.0 pts |
| Total Points: 150.0 |