Evidence Based Practice in Nursing and Health Care Article Critique

Thank you for your submission. Feedback on your assignment is given to you in three ways:

Firstly, through selected rubrics that show how your work was classed against feedback criteria. Secondly, brief marker comments (on text and summarised), linked to the learning outcomes of the module, that indicate areas of your work that that were either particularly strong or would benefit from further clarification or discussion. Finally, you are awarded a summative percentage mark for the assignment. In addition, we include a similarity score or text match score to demonstrate originality of work.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Special arrangements:

N/A

Turnitin Originality Report: 40% similarity reported, no concerns are raised

Learning Outcomes:

Demonstrate an ability to reflect on the relationship between principles and practice and assess the implications and consequences of actions and the underpinning rationale for child nursing practice N/A

Identify their own and others’ personal beliefs and values and analyse how these might impact upon their relationships with others, including children/ young people and their family/ carers and how the group discussion might have influenced their thinking, views and practice N/A

Evaluate the efficacy of their own coping strategies and consider a wider range of potential thoughts, feelings and actions N/A

Evidence their progressive development of personal and professional skills Partially met

Strengths of your work:

You set the scene for your critique, showing some understanding of EBP and in the main body of your work you made a clear attempt to address the elements of the assignment brief

On occasion you used literature to support your discussion points, and there was evidence you attempted to apply this to your critique

Your reference lists evidences that you have accessed some appropriate information sources to support your discussion

Areas which would benefit from further clarification/ can be improved upon:

You could have rationalised your choice of framework in relation to your chosen article and you could have rationalised your choice of article. You needed to include literature to support your discussion of critical appraisal and it would have been beneficial to have signposted the inclusion of an appendix

The structure and flow of your assignment was at times confusing and your knowledge and understanding of key research processes was very limited; it is important that you keep sight of the aim of this assignment which is to critique a research article. Although it is apparent you have engaged in some independent reading, this was not consistently applied to support your writing. Further reading will support you to develop your knowledge and clarify your understanding of key research concepts and how they applied to your article, please see in text comments for examples of where this could have been achieved

You could have developed your conclusion to give greater depth in regards to your own learning, more in depth understanding of the research design would have enabled you to draw more robust conclusions. Although you included an appendix, your annotations were minimal and needed to be developed to demonstrate greater understanding of the research process and this would have enhanced your critique

You writing style is somewhat descriptive and would benefit from being more concise. You are strongly encouraged to seek support with your academic writing via student support and the learning skills hub