NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma

This is a CLC assignment.

Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community: Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part assignment.

After completing the individual interviews (Part ONE), share your interview results. Consider the responses of the four types of individuals interviewed. Assess their similarities and differences.

Compose a written recommendation of 750-1,000 words. Incorporate the research YOU HAVE done as well as your interview results for the four types of individuals to come to a resolution to the ethical dilemma. Be sure to clearly articulate your position and the rationale for your position. NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Literature Search

Conduct a literature search to locate research articles focused on a practice problem of interest. This literature search should include both quantitative and qualitative peer research articles to support your practice problem or issue of interest in 350-750 words. Identify six peer research articles which will be utilized through the next 5 weeks as reference sources. NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma

Create a reference list in which the six articles are listed. Beneath each reference include the article’s abstract. The completed assignment should have a title page and a reference list with abstracts.

Suggestions for locating qualitative and quantitative research articles from credible sources:

Use a library database such as CINAHL

Complete for your search.

Using the advanced search page check the box beside “Research Article” in the “Limit Your Results” section.

When setting up the search you can type your topic in the top box, then add quantitative or qualitative as a search term in one of the lower boxes. NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma

Research articles often are described as qualitative or quantitative.

To narrow/broaden your search, remove the words qualitative and quantitative and include words that arrow or broaden your main topic. For example:

Diabetes and pediatric and dialysis.

To determine what research design was used, review the abstract and the methods section of the article. The
author will provide a description of data collection using qualitative or quantitative methods.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student
Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Description

In this task, you are required to demonstrate a professional level of knowledge and understanding in relation to ‘professional, ethical and inclusive behaviours.

To complete the task, you should provide a written response to each of the points below, making appropriate use of academic theory and practical examples to expand your response and illustrate key points. NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma

NOTE: To help the reader, please make use of headings and assessment criteria references to signpost the assessment criteria being addressed.

1- Define the term professional and explain what it means to be a ‘people professional’. HR professional

2- Explore how the role of a people professional (either a generalist or a particular specialist) is evolving and the priorities this raises for continuing professional development (CPD)

3- Discuss the concept of ‘ethical values’, and how at least three ethical values that you hold personally, impact (or could impact) on your work as a people professional. NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma

4- Explain why it is essential for people professionals to contribute confidently to discussions, and ways of doing this that are:

-Informed

-clear

-engaging.

5- Discuss when and how to raise concerns when issues such as organizational policies or leadership approaches conflict with ethical values or legislation.

6- Provide a robust argument for ethical people practice that is supported by academic theory and details both the business and human benefits of people at work feeling included, valued and fairly treated. NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma

7- Drawing on your own or a hypothetical example of providing a people practice solution to meet a particular need or introducing a new policy or initiative, describe:

-Strategies for designing the solution/initiative so that it will be inclusive

-Strategies for checking that, when in practice, the solution/initiative engages and meets the needs of all those it is aimed at.

From your own example of experience or you would do/ how did you design it or from you get the idea of. NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma