NR 392 Week 5 Discussion Recent

Strategies for Interprofessional Collaboration to Promote Quality

This week as we focus on interprofessional collaboration to promote quality, please remember that professionals include dietitians, therapists (respiratory, physical, occupational, and speech), social workers/case managers, psychologists, physicians, pharmacists, and others. Professionals do not include patients, families, aides, or unlicensed assistive personnel. NR 392 Week 5 Discussion Recent

Working as an interdisciplinary team helps promote positive patient outcomes. What strategies do you use to successfully work with other professions in your workplace to promote quality care? What strategies are not successful? What are the barriers to interprofessional collaboration, and how will you overcome these barriers? NR 392 Week 5 Discussion Recent

Guidelines for Course Project Milestone 3:

The Interview

Purpose

The purpose of the Course Project is to give the student the opportunity to apply concepts in transcultural nursing by conducting a transcultural nursing assessment. The purpose of Milestone 3is to conduct an interview as part of a transcultural nursing assessment, and conduct an interview. You will submit a written document reflecting on concepts of transcultural nursing related to the interview. NR 392 Week 5 Discussion Recent

Course Outcomes

The completion of the Course Project enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.

CO #1: Identify theories, concepts, and beliefs related to transcultural nursing. (PO#1)

CO #2: Communicate effectively with culturally diverse individuals, families, and organizations. (PO #3)

Points

The entire project is worth 600 points. Milestone 3 is worth 300 points of this total. NR 392 Week 5 Discussion Recent

Due Dates

You are to submit your completed NR391 Milestone 3: The Interview to the Dropbox by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT,at the end of Week 6.

Requirements and Guidelines

1. Review the Course Outcomes for this assignment, which are listed above.

2. Schedule a time to meet with the interviewee to conduct a face-to-face interview. You may not conduct the interview by phone call, e-mail or by asking the interviewee to fill in a form. You must be able to understand your interviewee. An interpreter is not allowed.

3. Do not conduct the interview prior to Week 6 in order to receive feedback from your instructor regarding Milestone 2: Interview Guide and Questions prior to meeting. This will allow you time to make adjustments in your questions if needed. If the interviewee’s schedule requires that you conduct the interview prior to Week 6, consult with your instructor regarding early submission of Milestone 2 to ensure that you receive timely feedback before the interview occurs. NR 392 Week 5 Discussion Recent

4. Conduct the interview in a professional manner using the preapproved questions (Milestone 2).

5. The Interview Assignment must be able to be attached to the Milestone 3 Dropbox and opened by the instructor for review using MS Word 2010.

6. Submit the completed Interview assignment to the Milestone 3 Dropbox by the Sunday of Week 6 at 11:59 p.m. MT. The length of your assignment should be no more than five to six typed, double-spaced pages.

7. There is no designated form for the assignment. The formatting of the Questions and Answers is at the discretion of the student. NR 392 Week 5 Discussion Recent

Description

PROPOSAL – WEEK 2 (50 POINTS)

Create a proposal of approximately 700 words that references one academic scholarly source for the research project you intend to complete. This project should engage at least one academic source, should include an introduction and thesis to the best extent that you know it at this point in time, and should locate a central controversy that requires deft and subtle handling. Be sure to adhere to APA style for in-text citation and final reference page. (No cover page is needed.) NR 392 Week 5 Discussion Recent

Select a project from among those suggested on the Course Project page under Course Home or discuss a special topic with your professor. NR 392 Week 5 Discussion Recent

Example Introduction/Thesis to a Student Paper:

It never ceases to amaze me that we pay so little attention to the greatest bulk of our intelligence—that is, the quality of thinking that helps us adapt, deal with stress, love, and live lives of fulfillment. Aristotle argued that educating the mind and not the heart is no education at all. For decades, educators have focused on cognitive skills because they are testable and, therefore, metrics can be applied to them. This kind of education, testing, and then metrically interpreting results has governed American education for decades. NR 392 Week 5 Discussion Recent

And the results have been losses of creativity, imagination, courtesy, civic interest, and the ability to invent businesses that serve people and advance us as a society. Although measurable skills are important, they are not exclusively important, and in fact lose value when separated from an education in the heart, the spirit, and the abstract qualities that make students fully human and excellent participants in a healthy society. NR 392 Week 5 Discussion Recent

Example Publication Detail Capture:

Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63.

uggested Topics of Investigation

Here are suggested topics, which you may elect to use or not use. If you wish to work outside of these suggestions, be sure to clear your project with your professor.

Compare and contrast society during the early Renaissance in Europe to contemporary society
Compare and contrast human understanding of the nature of revenge prior to and after the creation of Hamlet
Analyze the themes, imagery or interpretation of The Waste Land and describe how one or more of these are found in contemporary society NR 392 Week 5 Discussion Recent
Evaluate the work of Artemisia Gentileschi Renaissance Artist and interpret why she is considered an early feminist
Analyze views of women’s reproductive solutions in the 19th Century and interpret their historical and contemporary impact.
Distinguish the essential differences between the major thought of Plato and Aristotle and use the information to illustrate the impact of philosophy on contemporary views on a given them (life, freedom, power, equality, and more)
Examine views of warfare and battle throughout the ages and provide an interpretation that explains the evolution of the faceless war
Analyze the impact of the Industrial Age and the rise of capitalism and discuss the key features of both and their influence on contemporary society
Investigate the history of slavery and discuss the ways in which this history impacts contemporary society NR 392 Week 5 Discussion Recent

Week 2: Course Project: Proposal

The Course Project proposal is due.Please review the Course Project Overview in Introduction and Resources for details.

Rubric

Course Project Topic Proposal

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

25.0 pts

Proposal addresses all aspects of the assignment. •The thesis statement clearly defines the topic •The introduction and thesis clearly identify a central controversy •The purpose of the paper is clear.

21.0 pts

Proposal addresses most aspects of the assignment. •The thesis statement clearly defines the topic •The introduction and thesis clearly identify a central controversy •The purpose of the paper is clear.

17.0 pts

Proposal addresses some aspects of the assignment. •The thesis statement clearly defines the topic •The introduction and thesis clearly identify a central controversy •The purpose of the paper is clear. NR 392 Week 5 Discussion Recent

13.0 pts

Proposal addresses few aspects of the assignment. •The thesis statement clearly defines the topic •The introduction and thesis clearly identify a central controversy •The purpose of the paper is clear.

0.0 pts

No effort

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity, Organization, and Writing Quality

10.0 pts

Throughout the whole work, the writing •actively engages with the topic •is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation •demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety •logically organizes ideas

8.5 pts

Throughout most of the work, the writing •actively engages with the topic •is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation •demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety •logically organizes ideas

7.0 pts

Throughout some of the work, the writing •actively engages with the topic •is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation •demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety •logically organizes ideas

5.5 pts

Throughout little of the work, the writing •actively engages with the topic •is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation •demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety •logically organizes ideas NR 392 Week 5 Discussion Recent

0.0 pts

No effort

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences

10.0 pts

•At least one academic scholarly source is identified •The proposal includes an APA citation in proper format.

6.0 pts

•At least one academic scholarly source is identified •The reference is not properly cited. NR 392 Week 5 Discussion Recent

0.0 pts

There is no academic scholarly source included.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength

5.0 pts

Proposal is 2 pages.

0.0 pts

Proposal is one page or less.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 50.0